UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :
:
v. : Crim. No. 97-0453 (JR) :
xxxxxxxxxx :
______________________________:
DEFENDANT'S PROPOSED STATEMENT OF THE CASE
AND VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS
xxxxxxxx, through undersigned counsel, respectfully requests that
in addition to the Ridley question, the Court read the following statement of the
case to the jury panel and ask the proposed following voir dire questions.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
VOIRE DIRE QUESTIONS
- A fundamental principle of our legal system is that when a person is charged with a
criminal offense, he is presumed to be innocent unless the government proves guilt beyond
a reasonable doubt. Mr. xxxxxx does not need to produce any evidence whatsoever to prove
his innocence. If you are selected as a juror in this case, how many of you will have
difficulty applying this rule of law?
- How many of you now have any opinion as to Mr. xxxxxx's guilt or
innocence?
- How many of you believe that because Mr. xxxxxx was arrested and
charged with a crime, that he is probably guilty of something?
- How many of you feel that you might have some difficulty presuming
that Mr. xxxxxx is innocent of the charges against him in this case?
- The government may call the following witnesses: (the government's
witness list is read to the jury).
- Mr. xxxxxx is presumed innocent of the charges against him, and has
no obligation to call any witnesses. Mr. xxxxxx may or may not call some or all of the
following witnesses: (A list of Mr. xxxxxx's possible defense witnesses will be prepared
before voir dire.)
Do any of you know any of the people whose
names I have read?
- This case will involve testimony regarding the neighborhood in and
around three locations in the
District of Columbia: Do any of you (or your family or close
friends) live in this neighborhood or have you or they lived there in the past? Or, is
there any other reason why you have a particular familiarity with this neighborhood?
- This case involves charges of illegally possessing a firearm and
knowingly and willingly possessing a controlled substance, crack cocaine with the intent
to distribute. How many of you feel that, because of the nature of the charges in this
case, it might be difficult for you to sit as a juror?
- As residents of a major metropolitan area, many of us are concerned
about guns and about crime. As jurors in this case, you would be required to set aside
your concerns and attitudes on general issues and decide this case independently and
solely on the evidence and the instructions as the Court gives them to you. How many of
you feel that you might find that difficult?
- Have you or anyone close to you had an unpleasant experience where
guns or drugs were involved?
- Are any of you, your close family or friends lawyers or law
students or have any of you ever studied law in the past?
- Have any of you, your close family or friends ever worked, either
formally or informally, or applied for employment with, a law enforcement agency? By law
enforcement agency I mean organizations such as the Metropolitan Police Department,
F.B.I., the State's Attorney's or District Attorney's Office, the United States Attorney's
Office, C.I.A., I.R.S., B.A.T.F., Secret Service, Military Police, U.S. Customs Office,
GSA Guards, D.C. building police, private security firms and the like?
- How many of you (or your close friends or relatives) have been
employed by any prison, jail, department of corrections, probation office, or parole
agency?
- Have any of you (or your close friends or relatives) ever worked
for either a Federal or local court system in any capacity?
- Have any of you ever served on a grand jury or a petit jury (civil
or criminal) in either the Federal or a local or state court system?
- Have any of you ever sat before on a criminal jury. If so, what
kind of case was it and what verdict, if any, did the jury reach?
- Is there anything about that experience--whether it involved the
lawyers, the judge, the accused, the evidence, or your jury deliberations--that makes you
feel that you would have trouble being fair and impartial, or that you believe would make
it difficult for you to serve as a juror in this case?
- Have any of you formed any opinions about either prosecutors or
defense attorneys which would affect you in deciding this case?
- How many of you feel that police testimony is more likely to be
believable or reliable than testimony by another witness?
- If you had to choose who to believe, a police officer or a witness
called by a defendant, how many of you would be more likely to believe the police officer
because he is a police officer?
- How many of you agree that in general police don't make mistakes?
- Do any of you now, or have you within the past five years, belonged
to or participated in any crime prevention groups, such as neighborhood watch
organizations, orange hat groups, or any other crime prevention groups?
- How many of you have strong feelings about drugs and crime?
24. To reach a verdict, every juror must agree on the verdict.
That is, any verdict must be unanimous. In deliberations you must consider the opinions
and points of your fellow jurors. In the final analysis, however, you must follow your own
conscience and be personally satisfied with any verdict.
25. Would any of you have difficulty expressing your own opinions
and thoughts about this case to your fellow jurors?
26. Do any of you feel that you would tend to go along with the
majority of jurors even if you did not agree just because you were in the minority?
Respectfully submitted,
A.J. KRAMER
FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER
__________________________
Valencia Rainey
Assistant Federal Public Defender
625 Indiana Avenue, N.W.
Suite 550
Washington, D.C. 20004
(202) 208 7500
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Proposed Statement
of Case and Voir Dire was served by hand-delivery on May 1, 1998 to: Eumi
Choi, Esq., Assistant U.S. Atorney, Office of the United States Attorney, 555 - 4th
Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20001.
__________________________
Valencia Rainey